Comparative quality, efficacy, heavy metal content and safety of selected african black soaps for skincare
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: There is an upsurge in the utilization of African black soaps. Hence, there is a need for evaluation of their quality and safety.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, efficacy, heavy metal content and safety of selected African black soaps.
Methods: The physicochemical properties of twelve black soaps were evaluated. Microbial load was analyzed and anti-microbial activity was evaluated. Heavy metal content was analyzed using atomic absorption spectrophotometer, environmental toxicity was analyzed using Allium cepa test, and skin irritation tests were also evaluated.
Results: The black soaps showed fair physicochemical properties. The soaps showed the absence of microbial colonies. All the soap samples showed antimicrobial efficacy against all the organisms tested except sample UPS2 which exhibited no anti-microbial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The study revealed the presence of 3+ heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As, Hg and Cr ) which were within acceptable limits; none of the soaps posed a carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic risk. The Allium cepa test showed that African black soaps tested retarded onion root growth. The skin irritation test (wash-off test) showed that the post-wash pH was between 4.95- 5.76. There was an increase in the post-wash trans-epidermal water loss in 87.5 % of the subjects and decrease in postwash sebum content in 62.5 % of the subjects.
Conclusion: This study has shown that there is a great prospect in the utilization of black soaps; however, there is
a need for regulation of raw materials, standardization of manufacturing processes and proper disposal of black soaps in order to safeguard public health.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Share
References
Ogunbiyi A, Enechukwu NA (2021). African black soap: Physiochemical, phytochemical properties, and uses. Dermatologic Therapy 34:e14870.
Lin A, Nabatian A, Halverstam CP (2017). Discovering Black Soap: A Survey on the Attitudes and Practices of Black Soap Users. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology 10 (7):18-22.
Moody JO, Adebiyi OA, Adeniyi BA (2004). Do Aloe vera and Ageratum conyzoides enhance the antimicrobial activity of traditional medicinal soft soaps (Osedudu)? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 92:57-60.
Rahayu S, Pambudi K, Afifah A, et al (2021). Environmentally safe technology with the conversion of used cooking oil into soap. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series 1869:012044.
Taiwo OE, Osinowo FAO (2001). Evaluation of various agro-wastes for traditional black soap production. Bioresource Technology 79(1):95-97.
Akinboro SA, Omotosho A, Adeyiga JA, Effiom E (2017). Comparative study of Moore and Mealy machine models adaptation in black soap
production. Nigerian Journal of Technology 36(2):603-10.
Adewusi AO, Akanle O (2020). Ose Dúdú: Exploring the Benefits of Yoruba Indigenous Black Soap in Southwest, Nigeria. International Indigenous Policy Journal 11(1):1-20.
Ogunsuyi HO, Akinnawo CA (2012). Quality Assessment of Soaps Produced from Palm Bunch Ash-Derived Alkali and Coconut Oil. Journal Applied Sciences Environ Manag 16(4):363-366.
Oluwalana EO (2018). Effects of Physico-chemical attributes of forest-based herbal soap on human skin in southwestern Nigeria. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 173 (1):1-12.
Edah AO, Nnoli CB, Wetkum DF (2017).Physicochemical Properties and Anti-Microbial Activity of Local Black Soap and its Comparison with
Ghana Soap with Respect to Nigerian Industrial Standard. American Research Journals of Chemistry 1(1): 30-36.
Sofowora A (1993). Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa. Spectrum Books Ltd, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oyekunle JAO, Ore OT, Ogunjumelo OH, Akanni MS (2021). Comparative chemical analysis of Indigenous Nigerian soaps with conventional ones. Heliyon 7(4):1-8.
Onyango PV, Nathan O, Osano A, Mesopirr L, Omwoyo W (2014). Assessment of the Physicochemical Properties of Selected Commercial
Soaps Manufactured and Sold in Kenya. Open Journal of Applied Sciences 04:433-40.
Pawar AP, Pawar DN, Dalvi YV (2019). Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Soap. Research Journal of Topical and Cosmetic Sciences 10(1):23-28.
Akinseye JF, Amadi O, Oluboyo Bernard O, et al (2021). Identification and Comparison of Microbial Load of Different Water Products Available in Ekiti State. Journal of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology 7(2):1-9.
Olajuyigbe OO, Adeoye-Isijola MO, Adedayo O (2017). A comparison of the antibacterial activity of some African black soaps and medicated soaps commonly used for the treatment of bacteriainfected wound. Journal of Medicinal Plants for Economic Development 1(1), a20.
Lim DS, Roh TH, Kim MK, Kwon YC, Choi SM, Kwack SJ, Kim BK, Yoon S, Kim HS and Lee BM (2018). Noncancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A 81(11):432-52.
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) (2012). The guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation. 8th
Revision. Adopted by the SCCS at its 17th Plenary Meeting of 11 December 2012 [cited 2022 Apr 4]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_006.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1993). Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessments. [cited 2022 Nov 9]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/iris/reference-dose-rfddescription-and-use-health-risk-assessments
Nag R, Cummins E (2022). Human health risk assessment of lead (Pb) through the environmentalfood pathway. Science of the Total Environment. 810:151168.
Agency and Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological Profiles. (ATSDR) (2023). [cited 2023 Jul 10]. Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp5-c8.pdf
Agency and Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological (ATSDR) (2023). [cited 2023 Jul 10]. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp2-c8.pdf
Agency and Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2023). [cited 2023 Jul 12]. Toxicological Profiles for Mercury. Available from:
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiledocs/index.html
Agency and Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Toxicological (ATSDR) (2023). [cited 2023 Jul 12]. Toxicological Profiles of Chromium. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiledocs/index.html
Ghaderpoori M, Kamarehie B, Jafari A (2019). Health risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetic products sold in Iran: the Monte Carlo simulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27(7):7588-95.
Arshad H, Mehmood MZ, Shah MH, Abbasi AM (2020). Evaluation of heavy metals in cosmetic products and their health risk assessment. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 28(7):779-90.
Zhitkovich A (2011). Chromium in Drinking Water: Sources, Metabolism, and Cancer Risks. Chemical Research in Toxicology 24(10):1617-29.
Gnonsoro UP, Yolande EDAA, Sangare NS, Kouakou YU, Trokourey A. (2022). Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) in Hydroalcoholic Gels of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Biological Trace Element Research 200(5):2510-18.
Sabeen M, Mahmood Q, Ahmad Bhatti Z, Faridullah, Irshad M, Bilal M, Hayat MT, Irshad U, Ali Akbar T, Arslan M, Shahid N (2020). Allium cepa assay based comparative study of selected vegetables and the chromosomal aberrations due to heavy metal accumulation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27(5):1368-74.
Ilomuanya M, Ayanlowo O, Ubani-Ukoma U,Ologunagba M, Odafi R, Nwankanma U (2020). Safety evaluation of different variants of a topically applied toilet bar soap range using skin irritancy testing methods in the Nigerian population. Journal of Pharmaceutical Technology 1(2):40-45.
Rai S, Acharya-Siwakoti E, Kafle A, Devkota, HP, Bhattarai A (2021). Plant-Derived Saponins: A Review of Their Surfactant Properties and
Applications. Sci 3(4):44.
Lukman A, Kabiru S, Fatima M, Nnamdi AA (2019). Comparative phytochemical analysis of local and foreign industrial black soaps. Journal of Chemical Society of Nigeria 44(2): 239-4.
Patel SS, Savjani JK (2015). Systematic review of plant steroids as potential antiinflammatory agents: Current status and future perspectives. Journal of Phytopharmacology 4(2):121-5.
Ecevit K, Barros AA, Silva JM, Reis RL (2022). Preventing Microbial Infections with NaturalPhenolic Compounds. Future Pharmacology
(4):460-98.
Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) (2018). Baby toilet soap - Specification (First edition) TBS/CDC2(5415) P3 https://ec.europa.eu/growth/toolsdatabases/tbt/en/search/?tbtaction=get.project&Country_ID=TZA&num=162&dspLang=en&basdated
eb=01/04/2018&basdatefin=30/04/2018&baspays=&baspays2=&basnotifnum=&basnotifnum2=&bastypepays=ANY&baskeywords=&project_type_num=1&project_type_id=1&lang_id=EN
Mohammed UF, Usman A (2018). Physico-Chemical Analysis of Some Soaps Produced from Five Locally Processed Nigerian Oils. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering 9(12): 531- 539.
Idoko O, Emmanuel SA, Salau AA, Obigwa PA (2018). Quality assessment on some soaps sold in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology 37(4):1137-40.
Bureau of Indian Standards BIS (2004). Toilet soap specification (Third Revision) IS 2888:2004.
Oyekanmi AM, Adebayo OR, Farombi AG (2014). Physiochemical Properties of African Back Soap, and It's Comparison with Industrial Black Soap. American Journal of Chemistry. 4(1):35-7.
Olayinka KO, Adetunde OT, Abatan FE, Oladosu NO (2016). Evaluation of Some Soaps and Detergents in the Lagos, Nigeria Market for Standard Organization of Nigerian Specification Compliance. University of Lagos Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 4(7):68-72.
Betsy KJ, Jilu M, Fathima R, Varkey JT (2013). Determination of Alkali Content & Total Fatty Matter in Cleansing Agents. Asian Journal of Science and Applied Technology 2(1):8-12.
Arasaretnam S, Venujah K (2019). Preparation of soaps by using different oil and analyze their properties. Natural Products Chemistry & Research 7(1):1-4.
Sharma KP, Belbase A, Neupane U (2020). Quality Control and Evaluation of Certain Properties of Soaps Available in Butwal Sub-metropolitan City, Nepal. Butwal Campus Journal 2(1):6-12.
Popescu V, Soceanu A, Dobrinas S, Stanciu G, Epure DT (2011). Quality Control and Evaluation of Certain Properties for Soaps Made in Romania. Scientific Study and Research: Chemistry and ChemicalEngineering 12(3):257-61.
Issa M, Isaac I, Matthew O, Shalangwa B, Sunday M (2020). Physicochemical Analysis For Quality And Safety Of Some Selected Animal Soaps Compared To Human Soaps In Plateau State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry 13(3):25-28.
Tarun J, Susan J, Suria J, Susan VJ, Criton S (2014). Evaluation of pH of Bathing Soaps and Shampoos for Skin and Hair Care. Indian Journal of Dermatology 59(5):442-444.
Ajongbolo K (2020). Chemical Properties of Local Black Soap produced from Cocoa Pod Ash and Palm Oil Waste. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development 4(6):713-715.
Costa FG, Horswill AR (2022). Overcoming pH defenses on the skin to establish infections. PLOS Pathogens 18(5):e1010512.
Tan J, Wang D, Cao H, Qiao Y, Zhu H, Liu X (2018). Effect of Local Alkaline Microenvironment on the Behaviors of Bacteria and Osteogenic Cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10(49):42018-29.
Aliyu MS, Tijjani MB, Doko MHI, Garba I, Ibrahim MM, Abdulkadir SM, Abba D, Zango U (2012). Antimicrobial Activity of Sabulun Salo a Local
Traditional Medicated Soap. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 20(1):35-38.
Puca V, Marulli RZ, Grande R, et al (2021). Microbial Species Isolated from Infected Wounds andAntimicrobial Resistance Analysis: Data Emerging from a Three-Years Retrospective Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 10(10):1162.
Peace OO, Kin A, Regina ODA, A.Victory O (2022). Comparative antimicrobial analysis of indigenous black soap variants. International Research Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 7(2):24-30
Health Canada (2012) Guidance on Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetics. https://www.canada.ca/en/healthcanada/services/consumer-product-safety/reportspublications/industry-professionals/guidanceheavy-metal-impurities-cosmetics.html. Accessed 20 Sep 2022.
United States Food and Drug Authorities (USFDA) (2020) FDA's Testing of Cosmetics for Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Cobalt, Lead, Mercury, and Nickel Content. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/potentialcontaminants-cosmetics/fdas-testing-cosmeticsarsenic-cadmium-chromium-cobalt-lead-mercury and-nick[48]el-content.com. Accessed 20 Sep 2022.
Zainy FMA (2017). Heavy Metals in Lipstick Products Marketed in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications 7(4):336-48.
Cabuga CC, Abelada JJZ, Apostado RRQ, Hernando BJH, Lador JEC, Obenza OLP, Presilda CJR, Havana HC (2017). Allium cepa test: An evaluation of genotoxicity. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 7(1):12-19.
Asio JRG, Garcia JS, Antonatos C, Sevilla-Nastor JB, Trinidad LC (2023). Sodium lauryl sulfate and its potential impacts on organisms and the
environment: A thematic analysis. Emerging Contaminants 9(1):1-10.
Ong MWS, Simion FA, Maibach HI (2014). Methods for Testing Irritation Potential. In: Alikhan A,Lachapelle J-M, Maibach HI (eds) Textbook of Hand Eczema. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin,Heidelberg, pp 233-46.
Plessis Jd, Stefaniak A, Eloff F, John S, Agner T, Chou TC, Nixon R, Steiner M, Franken A, Kudla I, Holness L (2013). International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration. Skin Research and Technology 19:265-278.